While being thorough in the planning stages of a new project can help mitigate a variety of potential risks, it might not always be possible to cover every issue that could arise on a project site. Issues such as differing site conditions can have a significant impact on project goals and schedules. Even if companies in Pennsylvania take steps to address the possibility of such conditions, similar concerns could still have a detrimental impact on the parties involved and may lead to a greater risk of construction disputes.
Differing site conditions may refer to issues that may vary from what was expected in initial project expectations. One common example of similar conditions could pertain to issues with ground soil on a project site, whether this involves the unexpected discovery of bedrock under the soil or in scenarios in which the soil gives way to the weight of structures. Even the discovery of archeological objects could also constitute a differing condition that could place project tasks on hold.
The discovery of unsafe conditions or substances is an issue that can also affect project goals. The presence of hazardous gases and dangerous substances such as asbestos are two common types of conditions that might affect the safety of a project. Even if it might be nearly impossible to predict when similar issues will arise, as the parties involved may have a great deal at stake, issues that affect project schedules could prompt intense disputes.
While there may be steps companies can take to address the possibility of similar issues, it could also be helpful to know the steps to take should such concerns lead to construction disputes. When facing such conflict, a company may choose to consult with legal counsel for aid in carefully addressing the situation and exploring its available options. An attorney in Pennsylvania can work with a client in preparing to protect the company’s future by pursuing a resolution that aligns with its interests and needs.